RSS

Monthly Archives: October 2007

a dash of hegemony, anyone?

he-ge-mo-ny  : n : preponderant influence or authority esp. of one nation over others.

Quelle surprise to hear Tricky Dick Cheney use this word in reference to Iran this week.  As in: Iran seeks hegemony over the entire Middle East and we won’t tolerate that (I’m paraphrasing here, but not much).  While Mr. Bush wandered away looking for his dictionary (“Damnit, Dick, I TOLD you no big words I’ll just mispronounce later!”), Cheney jumped onto the speaker’s podium and set us up for another war.  Oh, we’ll blame it on Iran alrighty, but let’s be real about the whole thing.  Cheney is just angry that Iran has the nerve to want us out of their neighborhood.  Hegemony is OUR game, daggone it; we thought of it first and intend to rule the whole world.   Does anyone see the irony of Dick’s speech here?  Probably not.  Probably, and sadly, most Americans don’t know what “hegemony” is, and the few who do seem to think we have the right to it anyway.

We are like the neighbor’s big, overgrown, idiot son armed with a huge baseball bat.  Yeah, everyone is scared of us because we’re big and we’re armed with a huge baseball bat.  They can’t reason with us because we’re, well, idiots.  All they can do is either hope they don’t have any good toys we want to bully them out of or try to build a big enough fence to keep us out of their yard.

Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 27, 2007 in Iran, MIC

 

banks

I had a thought today as I had to find a canceled check to give to my Dad. My bank, like so many others these days, does not send back my canceled checks. Instead, I get copies of the checks microscopically printed on a piece of paper in the bank statement. Why does the bank do that, I wonder? I can cut out the copy I need, but it’s so tiny, I don’t know that Dad will be able to read it. Does the bank save money on postage by making teeny copies instead of mailing the original canceled checks? If so, just how much could they possibly be saving? And wait, I PAID for those checks; why aren’t they mine again when the bank is done using them to clear the money from my account? Instead of giving them back to me, someone has to copy them to send me the copies and then what do they do with the originals…destroy them? So the bank may have saved a penny on their bulk mailing rate, but they paid an employee to copy and destroy (or file or whatever they do) the originals. How strange. Also, there are times when the original canceled check is required, as in the case when an employer is trying to prove to the IRS that a tax has been paid.

Another thing that banks do now is to require fingerprints when one wants to cash a check. You know what I mean; say your boss has written you a paycheck and you need the cash immediately and don’t want to wait for the check to clear. You take the check to your boss’ bank where the funds are controlled, and they will give you cash for the check right away. Then you have the actual cash to deposit into your account or to spend at the store, etc. and needn’t wait for the paycheck to clear the banks before you can pay bills. Quite a few banks now not only require photo i.d. to cash the check for you, they also take your thumb print. But WHY? Isn’t the photo i.d. proof you are who you say you are? What are they doing with the prints? Can any institution now randomly require fingerprints of us, and what do they do with them? Does this mean that we are unwittingly creating a data base of our fingerprints somewhere for some purpose? I mean, really, the bank doesn’t have anything to compare my fingerprints to (can you imagine: “Wait, Ms. Customer, we’ll give you the cash for this check after our on-site forensic analyst compares your print to the last print you left to make sure you’re still the same person.”) Seriously, why are they collecting fingerprints?

Amazing the nonsense we tolerate. We wouldn’t for one hot SECOND put up with the stuff from neighbors or fellow citizens that we consent to from our institutions and government. Maybe that’s why there is so much road rage and random anger in the streets. We’re taking out our angst on each other since we feel powerless against the machine.

Back in the day, we would have picketed or something. Now, we blog. For all the good it does.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 26, 2007 in Uncategorized