Okay. I can’t take it any more. Truly, the water in the U.S. has been spiked with stupid pills and all the media and pundits and Congress and we, the people, are drinking it.
Witness the Palin phenomenon: She is an idiot. She has no thoughts whatsoever on any subject, save the idea that she wants to be in a position of power. She cannot speak in coherent sentences, although one would assume that studying journalism for 6 years would lead to a basic understanding of sentence structure and grammar.
Her beliefs are fairly astounding. She belongs to a church (one associated with Joel’s Army) that preaches that Armageddon is nigh, and will be preceded by a war with Russia. Now, belief in the End Days is not unusual in and of itself; what is odd is the contention that we humans can “force” the Second Coming through our own actions. Joel’s Army and its affiliated churches believe that if we start a war (preferably with Russia, although some suggest China will do in a pinch), this will usher in the end-times and God will then begin Armageddon with the “saved” being rescued from the worst of the torments while the “damned” are roasted for a thousand years, followed by the damned being utterly destroyed and Christ’s return to a new peaceful earth. The exact stages and order of happenings is hotly disputed amongst the believers, but the main idea is not. The main idea is what I have a problem with. Oh, maybe the end times will come or are here. Maybe Jesus will return. Maybe even in my lifetime. But the very idea that humans could force God to do anything is bizarre. If one believes that God is a real god – that He’s all-powerful and supreme and all is going according to His plan – why would we flimsy humans then postulate that we can “force” him to take any action whatsoever? And if one believes the Biblical teaching that even Jesus knows not the time, then why assume that WE get to choose the time? What hubris! Not to mention the fact that all this war-talk is completely antithetical to the words of Jesus himself. He warned AGAINST wars and OF wars, but never recommended starting wars. Actually, I think he talked quite a bit about the positive and endearing (to God) aspects of meekness, mildness, restraint, and humility. But maybe that’s just some misprinting in my Bible. While I know Palin plans to offer Alaska as a refuge for the “saved” from the devastation of the lower 48 after her ushering in of the end times through a forced nuclear war with Russia, that is scant comfort. I am not happy with the idea of a vice president who thinks she has a spiritual mandate to push the little red button.
Palin also believes that we should have abstinence-only sex ed, overturn Roe vs Wade, and disallow the sale of contraceptives (as they are a form of abortion). She may have felt this way before she joined the Republican Party, although these happen to also be the official stances of the Republican platform. The Repub platform also calls for refusing to fund any organization that supports abortion in any way, even the United Nations and other international organizations. This means that if the UN does not specifically denounce abortion as an option in all countries, the Repubs would not fund its programs. They would likewise refuse funding to any group that does not support traditional marriage. Further, any physician or health-care provider should be free to deny birth control measures or referrals for abortions based on what his conscience dictates. Hungry little kids in Africa born with AIDS? You can stay hungry and without medicine until your country agrees to outlaw abortion and support only male/female marriages. No food for you! (No access to birth control also means perhaps more little brothers and sisters, maybe even some more born with AIDS, to feed, but we will, um, pray a lot for you, how’s that?) This is not a just Palin platform, as I said, it is in the 2008 Republican platform. The fact that she supports it is perhaps because of her particular religious beliefs; I find it highly unlikely she actually read all 60 some-odd pages of the Republican Party Platform for this year.
Ah, and let’s examine socialism for a moment, shall we? Apparently, Obama is a socialist. Ask any Palin supporter. Mind you, neither she nor they could define “socialism” if you gave them a week and a dictionary, but this doesn’t stop them from chanting the mantra ad nauseam at her rallies. Utilizing our progressive tax system to fund public programs and help the neediest in our society is marginally socialistic in its concept, but it is the way we have done it for a century. A good thing, too, since before we had progressive taxes, we allowed child labor, “madhouses” for the insane and/or homeless, and had no social programs such as WIC, S-CHIP, food stamps, social security, etc. Neither McCain nor Obama are socialists; they both use the tax system we’ve got, just in different ways. In a socialist country, the banks and businesses would be owned by the government, income limits would be strictly curtailed and all profits would be seized by the government for its redistribution. Name a socialist country. (Here’s a hint; France is not socialist. They have some socialistic programs, but are a republic. The old USSR was a socialistic country. See the difference?) Palin’s and McCain’s crowds are equally comfortable and happy repeating, zombie-like, ANY phrase fed to them. “Joe, Joe, Joe,” they yell when Palin mentions the not-named-Joe-who-is-not-a-plumber dude. Yesterday, she made a comment that McCain had recently talked to a supporter named Tito and….the crowd began roaring “Tito, Tito, Tito,” before she even finished her sentence. For all they knew, she was getting ready to say that Tito was actually an Obama plant, or an illegal immigrant or something, but such is the trust of these morons that they assume a pearl of wisdom or a Story of Great Merit to be Passed on to the Generations is about to be imparted to them. Oh, treasure the moment, so you can tell your grandkids that you saw The Palin in person.
A huge number of us, including Palin, seem to think we were founded as a “Christian” nation and as proof, offer the tidbits that our money has “In God We Trust” printed on it and our pledge has the words “under God” included in it. They mention that we have the “freedom of religion”, not the “freedom FROM religion” in our Constitution. They haven’t actually read the Constitution themselves, of course, but someone (the pastor at their church, I suspect) told them this was a good talking point. Amendment 1 of the Constitution stipulates that “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion” and that is a fairly rigorous separation of church and state, as I read it. Palin wants to change the Constitution to recognize the US as a Christian nation. We’ve already had huge portions of our Constitution high-jacked in the last 8 years. Enough of that. I certainly don’t mind any public official being a Christian – I am one myself – but to pretend to espouse Christian beliefs to sell oneself is, well, un-Christian. A true Christian would not lie. In the eyes of God, a sin is a sin; all carry equally His wrath. So to say abortion is a sin, but then to lie, overtly and repeatedly, as Palin does, is to be the same sinner as the person who has an abortion. Mis-use of public funds is theft, and a sin. Wanting to war with every single country that doesn’t agree with us is certainly not the preaching of Christ, who said to turn the other cheek and love our enemies. I have never seen so much hate directed at the rest of humanity as I see from the fundamentalist “Christian” right.
I would have thought her ties to and applauding of the Alaska Independence Party would have made her ineligible for public office in any case. The Constitution stipulates that no-one running for a public office where he will be required to take an oath to uphold the Constitution may have been involved in insurrection or rebellion against same. Surely the AIP, as a party which exists with the sole aim of seceding from the United States, qualifies as rebellion against the Constitution. [Todd Palin, the “first dude”, was a registered member of the AIP for 7 years. Both the chairman and the vice-chairman of the AIP insist that Sarah was a member and only switched her registration to Republican in order to win the mayoral seat in Wasilla and “infiltrate” the political system under a more acceptable party banner. She has attended two of their conventions and has addressed them, with praise “for their work”, as recently as June of this year.] Maybe my Constitution has the same misprints as my Bible?
This election just has me grinding my teeth. All the stupids have come out of the closet and they get to vote. And some of them get to talk on TV. Like, in PUBLIC and all.
I suppose ignorance could be corrected with education, but stupid is forever.